@Irfan76
Sir I understand that the criterion is conscience, but that relates only application, when the heart finds that pivotal point/s in something, then it tells us to avoid. but that pivotal point is first established by a framework of law.
I’m just trying to find out that pivotal point, the framework on which our heart would measure things from.
So what is the framework of law regarding it? if we say it’s anything that “leads to sin” then what thing or framework qualifies it to the “leads to sin” category?
1) Is it applicable if in case, if any action, when done, then the effects of things that are majorly caused by that action would only lead to major sin and not anything else. where we can think of it as something yielding only negative effects. For example a man and woman touching each other, the major effect of this endeavor is sprouting lust, and the end point, the crux, the destination of lust is having ultimate act of intimacy. Here we can generally say that the general effect of touches is only negative yielding effects.
On the other hand if something yields generally good or generic effects, but along with it some negative effects of sin creeps in too. which can be mitigated in frequency but still may occur only seldomly due to slippages. Then this won’t be categorized as “leading to sin” despite the fact, that if someone adopts it, then alongwith many benefits and things, some seldom occurences of sin would happen too? Here it’s about ratio and what’s the main effect being achieved by the action that makes the action good or bad, and hence okay or sinful, respectively.
2) or is it that regardless of ratio and what’s the main effect and what creeps in along with it. it is the mere fact that since sin also creeps along with it so now it means doing that action would logically cause some instances of sin as well. so now this action will also categorically sin to do under “sadd e zariya”
I want to know the framework of