-
Hadith As A Form Of Revelation In The Light Of Quran 53:3-4 And Quran 16:44
Heard someone say that Wahi Is also a form of Wahi and hence important as Quran.
For proof, they cited surah Najam verse 3 where it says “neither does he speak his own whims. It is only revelation sent down to him”.
I find this very bizarre for 2 reasons as 1) I’m pretty sure this refers to claims of Qureshi and makkans calling the actual Quran revealed to the prophet (S) made up by him and Allah (set) responding to them in surah najam. 2) if each and every thing the prophet (S) said was Wahi then what about the non-religious or secular conversations he had in the privacy of his own home or with his close relatives. For example he could have told his wives to pass him some food or anything related to his humanly needs in the comfort of his home, would that also be a wahi 😕?
Furthermore they cited surah 16:44 as well where Allah (SWT) says that the prophet (S) was given a reminder so that he could explain the Quran to them via Hadith which I find somewhat does makes sense. But given the whole history of Hadith compilation etc it seems that the early Muslims had literally missed the bus and we’re not as rigorous to preserve the Hadith from day 1 as to not mix it up with the Quran and hence the development of the whole sciences etc.
Nevertheless proponents of Hadith as revelation claim that if a Hadith is proven to be Sahih, it is “Qataee” and should be treated as revelation and should be followed. I’m interested in what was the origin of the doctrine I mentioned in the previous sentence and what Ghamidi Sahibs proof is that not all Hadith irregardless of being Sahih are Qataee.
Sponsor Ask Ghamidi