-
Surah Al Maidah V117 Interpretation By Ghamidi Saheb
Assalamualaikum!
I have listened to the 23 questions series regarding Nuzool e Maseeh (AS), and therefore have listened to Ghamidi saheb’s interpretation of the last verses of Surah Al Maidah as well as Hasan Ilyas saheb’s questions on that particular interpretation.
https://youtu.be/6NYva04ZiB0?si=ays7cH0–hGkvzl4
https://youtu.be/eX1ZdacInl8?si=xjn_mbIa-758DrIp
Speaking from my heart and of course I can be wrong, that interpretation doesn’t seem to be in conjunction with the words used by Allah swt Himself.
Let’s look at it:
Verse 117: “……. Or main in par gawah Raha jb tak in main mujood Raha, Phir jb to ne mujhe utha Lia, to tu hi in par nigraan Raha, or tu to har cheez pr gawah hi hai”
Interpretation: Ghamidi Saheb says it was necessary for Jesus to have mentioned his second coming had he been sent again just before Qayamah.
And he is necessarily NOT talking about the followers of his age since this falsehood occured hundreds of years after him.
Problem: Still, it doesn’t necessitate the fact that he wasn’t sent again BECAUSE he could simply have talked about the people who began these false accusations on him and his mother hundreds of years after him, uptil the people just before his second coming!
Why does Ghamidi saheb assume it was necessary for second coming to have been mentioned at this point?
His sole point is based on lack of mentioning in this ayat, and a lack of something doesn’t negate it all together, does it?
In the 23 questions series, he insists again and again on the words he’s attributing to Jesus (AS) while explaining verse 117, “Main nahi jaanta us k baad inhon ne Kia Kiya”……. But these words aren’t said by Jesus even once in that ayat!!!@UmerQureshi
Would be grateful if you guys explain the highlighted part to me. Explanation by anyone else is also welcomed.
Jazak Allah!
Sponsor Ask Ghamidi