-
Why Would Anyone Have To Be Rebellious Or Arrogant To Commit Minor Sins?
There are threads on this site as well as the rest of the internet where scholars are giving opinions regarding minor sins that make no sense and make things more difficult than otherwise intended by God.
Minor sins are always minor. If one commits them knowing that they are minor and that God doesn’t punish him for doing the minor sins, where is arrogance or rebelliousness in this? To me, bringing rebelliousness and arrogance into this makes one to be too much afraid of minor sins as well which I don’t think is intended as this makes one too cautious and burdened.
So, minor sins are always minor. when there is no need to be rebellious in order to commit them, there is no rebelliousness or arrogance.
An example is watching porn. Ghamidi sir gave such a strong argument regarding this that it starts to look like some major sin. If God has strictly forbidden adultery because it makes it difficult to keep your family intact, then giving same reasoning to stop watching porn makes it equal to adultery which makes no sense to me. He could have simply told the viewers that watching porn is biologically very harmful and people will just stop watching it based on that but the strict religious argument he gave, made this look like a major sin.
Or am I missing something? Please clarify regarding this matter. Thank you
Sponsor Ask Ghamidi