-
Perpetual Transmission Of The Sacrificial Incident Of Ismael SAW
Assalamu Alaikum
In the definition of tawatur one thing is said it is logically impossible that such large number of people will gather and conspire that. But in the story of Ibrahim AS, we get that a whole nation conspired and gathered on that Isaac AS was chosen for that sacrificial act and not Ismael AS?
-
3 Replies
-
Perpetual Transmission Of The Sacrificial Incident Of Ismael SAW
updated 1 month ago
2 Members
·
3
Replies
-
Twatur is established where it concerns. Ishmael belonged to Arabs. In this regard their tawatur is considered. The same is the case with Ishmaelites. They were unaware of zul Qarnain whose story was an established fact with the Jews.
-
But the house of God is established at a place called Makkah/Bakkah and this incident is a ritualistic part of the Hajj. Then how can this happen that a nation where traditional transmission is strong alters the incident and we get no report of anyone objecting. In other words, either the whole nation conspired regarding that alteration in the incident or not, if not then why don’t we get any reports of people objecting that thing/alteration.
-
Kaaba is there and it is an established fact that it was built by the prophet Ibrahim. Now why bani Israel didn’t mention it as they should is a matter of historical enquiry. We know that they migrated to Egypt and the very begining of their Inception as a nation. They were subjugated and liberated by Moses and then they got busy with their affairs. They were enslaved again and again. Then they deviated from their religion. The whole nation became polythiests. The prophets tried to correct them. They killed their prophets and so on. They were a small community. They not only did not do hajj, but they became idol worshippers. They left prayer. They tried to kill the prophet Jesus. This is their history.
Sponsor Ask Ghamidi
