Forums › Forums › General Discussions › Mustache
-
Mustache
Posted by Mohammad Hasan on January 27, 2026 at 3:51 amFashion ke taur pr lambi muche rakhna kaisa
Mahnoor Tariq replied 1 month, 4 weeks ago 4 Members · 15 Replies -
15 Replies
-
Mahnoor Tariq
Contributor January 27, 2026 at 11:26 am -
Mohammad Hasan
Member January 27, 2026 at 9:41 pmModerator please jawab de de monche rakhna sunnat deen k hissa h kyuki Maine response 23 me suna monche rakhna sunnat h
-
Dr. Irfan Shahzad
Scholar January 27, 2026 at 11:14 pmمونچھیں رکھنا سنت نہیں ہے۔
رسول اللہ ﷺ نے بڑی مونچھیں رکھنے سے منع کیا ہے،۔ یہ تکبر کی علامت ہیں۔ نیز، کھانے پینے میں ملوث ہو جاتی ہیں اور یہ کھانے پینے کے تزکیے کے خلاف ہے
-
Zohaib Tariq
Member January 28, 2026 at 4:14 amAre they symbol of arrogance for every time period?
-
Dr. Irfan Shahzad
Scholar January 29, 2026 at 3:57 amNo. The society and cultural norm tells the symbols of arrogance.
-
-
Mohammad Hasan
Member January 28, 2026 at 11:16 amhttps://www.facebook.com/share/r/1Ha6Yhczij/
Apne kha monche rakhna sunnat nhi h aur yha dekhiye ghamidi sahab ne khud kha h ki past monche rakhna sunnat k darja de diya to deen k hissa huwa hadees se to akbare ahad h to isme deen k hissa hona deen milna
-
Dr. Irfan Shahzad
Scholar January 29, 2026 at 3:59 amمونچھوں کو پست کرنا سنت ہے، انھیں رکھنا سنت نہیں چنانچہ اگر کوئی سرے سے نہ رکھے تو اسے رکھنے کا نہین کہا جائے گا۔
-
Mahnoor Tariq
Contributor January 29, 2026 at 4:10 amIt is often said that keeping a long moustache is a sign of arrogance or pride (takabbur). But I find this difficult to understand in today’s context. I don’t believe that simply having a long moustache makes a person arrogant, nor do I personally associate long moustaches with pride or superiority. When I see someone with a long moustache, I usually think it is a fashion choice or a personal style, not an expression of ego.
Since arrogance is an inner attitude and depends on intention and behavior, not appearance alone, how should we understand this claim today? Is it correct to label a physical style as arrogance when social meanings have clearly changed and most people no longer interpret it that way?
-
Zohaib Tariq
Member January 30, 2026 at 3:42 amSo if someone has moustache it’s obligatory on him to keep them lowered as they are from Sunnah otherwise that would result in sin?
-
-
Dr. Irfan Shahzad
Scholar January 29, 2026 at 4:15 amThere are two aspects in not allowing large moustaches: Food to eat without involving a moustache, and to avoid a symbol of arrogance.
If it is no longer a symbol of arrogance, the objection drops. But the first one still stands.
-
Mahnoor Tariq
Contributor January 29, 2026 at 4:29 amFrom my understanding, a moustache itself is neutral. Hair is made of keratin and is not impure. The only possible issue is that hair is porous, so food can stick to it — but with normal daily hygiene, washing the face, and especially making wudu multiple times a day, this does not remain a problem.
In that case, why is the moustache itself treated as an issue? If cleanliness is maintained and no food remains stuck, how does it become religiously objectionable or discouraged? Why would something neutral in itself be considered a problem when the practical concern can be easily addressed through hygiene?
-
Dr. Irfan Shahzad
Scholar January 30, 2026 at 5:29 amWashing face later does not change the fact that a big moustache gets involved with food that causes disgust.
-
Mahnoor Tariq
Contributor January 30, 2026 at 6:10 amMy confusion is about the criterion. You mentioned two reasons: arrogance and food getting involved. Arrogance is clearly context-based and intention-based. The food issue also seems context-based, because hygiene, habits, and even feelings of disgust differ from person to person. Disgust itself is a subjective human emotion, not an objective moral category—many people do not feel disgust at all if cleanliness is maintained.So my question is: does something become religiously disallowed simply because some people find it unpleasant, or is the ruling conditional on context and neglect of cleanliness? If both reasons are context-dependent, then how can the ruling be treated as a fixed “must-not” instead of guidance tied to circumstances?From what I understand, Islam generally gives principles and leaves their application to context, rather than declaring neutral things impermissible in all cases. So is the moustache issue meant to be advisory and contextual, or is it being treated as absolutely prohibited regardless of hygiene, intention, or culture?
-
-
Mohammad Hasan
Member January 29, 2026 at 9:32 amTo agar past rakhna sunnat h to ye deen k hissa huwa to ye ijma aur tawatur se koi nhi muntakhil huwa ye hadees mila humko laikin deen to quran sunnat h jo ijma tawatur se muntakhil huwa
-
Dr. Irfan Shahzad
Scholar January 30, 2026 at 5:30 amبڑی مونھچ نہ رکھنا اور بڑی مونچھ کو ناپسندیدہ سمجھنا مسلمانوں کے عمل میں موجود ہے۔ اس کا حوالہ حدیث میں بھی آ گیا ہے۔ یہ نہ بھی ہوتا تب بھی عملا مسلمان بڑی مونچھیں نہ رکھ رہے ہوتے۔
-
Sponsor Ask Ghamidi