Forums › Forums › General Discussions › Were Islamic Battles All Defensive?
-
Were Islamic Battles All Defensive?
Posted by A Hasan on January 19, 2021 at 3:45 pmA Hasan replied 3 years, 11 months ago 3 Members · 17 Replies -
17 Replies
-
Were Islamic Battles All Defensive?
-
A Hasan
Contributor January 19, 2021 at 3:49 pmWhy would 9:14 mean punishment when it comes with (يعذبهم الله بايديكم) when the makkans simply gave makkah over? How is that a punishment
-
$ohail T@hir
Moderator January 19, 2021 at 4:04 pmno
-
A Hasan
Contributor January 19, 2021 at 5:56 pm -
A Hasan
Contributor January 19, 2021 at 5:58 pmWhat about the above graphic I gave? What is false in it? Don’t they show that most were a defensive retaliation?
-
$ohail T@hir
Moderator January 19, 2021 at 6:05 pmWere Islamic Battles “All” Defensive?
Answer: No (Note All in your question)
-
A Hasan
Contributor January 19, 2021 at 6:12 pmWhich ones were offensive?
-
$ohail T@hir
Moderator January 19, 2021 at 6:20 pmpls see this: Discussion 1114 • Reply 1114
There is book by Ammar Khan Nasir on this thread (in Urdu – on Jihad)
-
$ohail T@hir
Moderator January 19, 2021 at 6:22 pmSee this: Discussion 1477 • Reply 1477
-
-
A Hasan
Contributor January 22, 2021 at 9:39 amThe two discussions linked only show that wars against oppression were conducted. Where is the irrefutable evidence in light of the image I shared above, that there was any punishment given in accordance to itmam e hujjah?
-
Afia Khan
Member January 22, 2021 at 9:59 amI think you are referring this comment
I think it is because of the law of itmam-e-hujjat. The people of the previous prophets, who rejected them were punished by natural disasters by Allah SWT. And the whole nations were destroyed under those Adhab illahi.
Qitaal fi Sabeel Allah (somehow called Jihaad now) was under the same law. It was the order of Allah.
Our beloved Prophet MPH mostly fight defensively. Prophet’s defensive battles, like Badr, Uhud, Ahzab and Hunayn, were where the enemy launched an offensive against the Muslims. While battles like Khaybar, Mu‘tah or Tabuk, where the Muslim state was aware of the enemy’s plans of aggression, resulted in a need to strike pre-emptively as a form of defense.
It is also because of Rehmah that not the whole nation was destroyed even after the conquest of Makkah.
-
A Hasan
Contributor January 22, 2021 at 10:01 amI see. But then where is the sunnah of Allah if there was no punishment like this?
-
Afia Khan
Member January 22, 2021 at 10:02 amThat is his mercy and Rahma. His another Sunnah Alhamdulillah!
-
A Hasan
Contributor January 22, 2021 at 10:04 amNo. The sunnah is jaza and Saza. This Sunnah never changes. The sunnah itself is that rahma is not shown because it is not appropriate when there is this level of rebellion
-
Afia Khan
Member January 22, 2021 at 10:56 amAbu Huraira reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “When Allah completed the creation, He wrote in His book with Him upon the Throne: Verily, My mercy prevails over My wrath.”
Source: Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 3022, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 2751
-
A Hasan
Contributor January 22, 2021 at 10:59 amThat is not relevant to the sunnah
-
Afia Khan
Member January 22, 2021 at 11:07 amI think for the previous Prophets they ask for adhab illahi. But Prophet Muhammad MPBH even after he had the oppertunity, ask for the forgiveness from Allah and pardoned everyone.
-
A Hasan
Contributor January 22, 2021 at 2:22 pmThe prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم has no power to pardon anyone. It is the sunnah of God to punish and reward. How do you know no other prophet asked for punishment?
-
Sponsor Ask Ghamidi