-
Compulsion Of Muslim Women To Cover Her Hair
I was told by a religious person that those who do not believe in the obligation of hijab are kafirs ie. the hide the truth knowingly. I share Ghamidi Sahab’s opinion on hijab does that make me a kafir? I don’t understand how Ghamidi Sahab interprets the head of a woman to be a part of the body parts that are exposed naturally. In fiqh books about the rules of awrah a large number of scholars like Ibn Qudammah RA, Imam Fakhruddin Razi RA ( In his tafsir) state that a free ( hurra) woman has to cover her hair while a slave woman can’t/ are not obligated . They state the narration where Umar, the Caliph beat a slave woman and pulled off her khimar from her head for emmulating free women ( apparently free women from higher classes covered everything frm head to toe while the slave woman was prevented from covering her hair and calves) The classical scholars said the awrah of a slave woman is from navel to the knee while for free women her whole body is her awrah. Now the verse in Surah Nur that talks about khimar addresses all believing women. But if we assume that this verse obligates covering of the head then are these scholars wrong in making seperate rules of headcovering for women of different classes. How could all of them do the same mistake? But if we assume that the khimar is not obligatory but the covering of the chest is then these scholars were right in interpreting this verse according to their traditional context , they didn’t see this verse as a ruling to cover hair so they made different rules of head covering for women of different classes. If this logic is correct then Ghamidi Sahab’s interpretation does resemble the interpretation of early scholars. Please comment on this.
Sponsor Ask Ghamidi