In Farahi Discourse, Quran and Sunnah are the primary sources of religion, Ahadith are elucidation of the same Quran and Sunnah. Therefore, Ahadith do not contain any independent directive on their own. The principles are present in Quran and Sunnah, while Ahadith contain application of the same principles. Therefore, these ahadith had to be subjected to the principle of arrogance in accordance with Quran even if they, hypothetically speaking, hadn’t contained the word arrogance in them (which is not the case here because many such ahadith specifically use the word Arrogance/Pride in them as can be seen in the first part of the same series whose link is provided in the comment below).
Therefore, after studying all such Ahadith in the light of Quran and Sunnah, Ghamidi Sahab writes:
“The issue of isbal-i izar is no different. It was very common among the arrogant in the pre-Islamic Arab society to wear a long shirt, let the loose end of their turban hang below their back and let their legware (izar) dangle so far below the ankles that half of it would drag behind on the ground. In Arabic, this is called isbal. The Prophet (sws) showed his great dislike for this, and once remarked that the Almighty would not like to see the person on the Day of Judgement who walked while arrogantly dragging his leg-cloth (tehband). All narratives regarding izar relate to this appearance.
It can however be said about the tehband that if it is allowed to dangle below the ankles, then it to some extent resembles the appearance of the arrogant just discussed; so care must be exercised even if the purpose to make it dangle is not arrogance. Thus this can be said about the tehband. However, it is a fact that this resemblance is only reflected in the tehband; it has no similarity with a shalwar, apajama and a trouser.”
Please also refer to the following to understand How Ahadith should be studied:
Discussion 32850 • Reply 32869
Discussion 56414 • Reply 56415