-
Logical Arguments For The Concept Of Afterlife
Humans are designed to accept and believe which they can see, touch or at least prove with scientific experimentation.
But we see that none of it holds true to the concept of afterlife.
As Ghamidi Sb proved the existence of God through 5 points (instinct of accepting God, Presence of a concept of God throughout history etc)
Are there any such logical arguments for the concept of Afterlife? Or is it just a by-product of believing in religion and hence believing in it?
-
2 Replies
-
Logical Arguments For The Concept Of Afterlife
updated 3 years ago
3 Members
·
2
Replies
-
To believe in the unseen is scientific. Theoratical physics is a good example of it. Human has the faculty to believe I’m something unseen for its evidences, probability and plausibility.
We believe in the hereafter not that we have proof for it but because we received the information from God. Secondly we find that unless there is hereafter the riddle of life doesn’t solve, without after life the world is a well organized purposeless phenomenon. Our sense of moral justice demands it to happen. Coming into being from nothing and the phenomenon of reproduction tells that this is quite probable.
-
Please refer to the following thread for arguments regarding the day of judgement:
Sponsor Ask Ghamidi
