Hadith Abu Dawud 4104

[Umer]

Which part are you talking about?

This Hadith is more likely Daif but there are two opinions on its grading.

[Muhammad Raheel]

I understand that azmi sahab said that it’s daif but albani said its hasan because of other hadith. Both have a point but I can’t understand that Abu Laith is critiqued but albani said he is trust worthy but what’s true

Secondly Each hadith is weak but albani view is that many hadiths make each other strong. So why don’t we consider him as many different people can’t quote the same thing more or less

[Umer]

All the supporting arguments presented by Shiekh Albani also have issues in them. At the end, a hadith scholar has to make a judgment call after considering all the evidence where two Hadith Scholars may differ. Even Albani calls it Hassan and not Sahih. Either way, in Farahi Epistemology, such differences do not have much impact. Our premise is primarily dependant on Quran and Sunnah, and after establishing the premise, Ahadith are understood in its light.

[Muhammad Raheel]

@UmerQureshi