Ask Ghamidi

A Community Driven Discussion Portal
To Ask, Answer, Share And Learn

Forums Forums Sources of Islam Are Bells Haram?

Tagged: , ,

  • Are Bells Haram?

    Posted by Junaid Ahmed on July 30, 2026 at 3:53 am

    There are two ahadith on bells:

    Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) as saying:

    Angels do not accompany the travellers who have with them a dog and a bell.

    https://sunnah.com/muslim:2113a

    Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) as saying:

    The bell is the musical instrument of the Satan.

    https://sunnah.com/muslim:2114


    But bells are commonly used in places like schools and fire departments. Nowadays some of them have electronic bells/alarms but in the past they used to have the traditional bells. Bells are also sometimes tied on the necks of the cattle, goats and pets. Are all these haram? How should we understand the hadith?

    Umer replied 1 week ago 2 Members · 1 Reply
  • 1 Reply
  • Are Bells Haram?

    Umer updated 1 week ago 2 Members · 1 Reply
  • Umer

    Moderator July 30, 2026 at 6:44 am

    Short answer: no. None of these are haram — not school bells, fire alarms, sirens, or bells on cattle, goats and pets.

    These narrations are not about music or prohibition at all. Ghamidi Sahab treats both reports (same reports appear as Abu Dawud 2555–2556, Musnad Ahmad 7566 and 8783) in Ghina aur Mousiqi . His first observation is that a jaras is not a musical instrument to begin with — it is the bell hung on the neck of camels and oxen in a moving caravan. So the reports cannot be used, as they commonly are, to establish the prohibition of musical instruments.

    They are isolated sentences stripped of their occasion. This is Ghamidi Sahab’s central methodological point: narrators frequently transmit one remembered sentence while dropping the incident, occasion and context that gave it meaning. Unlike the Quran, a lone sentence in a report cannot be read as a self-standing legal ruling; its background has to be reconstructed from the surrounding narrations.

    Read in context, the subject is the Prophet’s own house and caravans. Related reports (including Umm Salama’s, al-Sunan al-Kubra of Nasai 9483, which adds houses) point to the same setting: the Prophet was continuously occupied in dhikr, recitation, nawafil and supplication while travelling, and the angels — who are perpetually engaged in tasbih and taqdis — frequented his house and accompanied his caravans. A bell tied to an animal’s neck cannot be switched off; it rings as long as the animal walks, and dogs bark continuously. Ghamidi Sahab’s point is that this constant, involuntary noise was a disturbance in that specific setting, and it is about those houses and those caravans. Extending it into a general ruling for all caravans and all houses is unwarranted.

    Two further indications that this is situational, not legal. Aisha (rta) reports that on the day of Badr the Prophet ordered the bells cut from the camels’ necks (Musnad Ahmad 25186) — before Badr they were in place, and after Badr nothing of the sort was said. Ghamidi Sahab considers the interpretation recorded in Lisan al-Arab the most plausible here: a ringing bell discloses a caravan’s position to the enemy. Secondly, revelation is itself described as coming to the Prophet like salsalat al-jaras, the ringing of a bell — which makes little sense if the sound were intrinsically satanic.

    On the general principle, only God has the right to declare something halal or haram, and that is established through the Quran. Reports of this kind, transmitted without context, do not create prohibitions. Bells that serve a purpose — signaling class periods, fire alarms, locating grazing animals, a doorbell, a phone ringtone — are simply utilitarian.

    The one thing that does carry over is an adab, not a ruling: needless loud noise that disturbs people at worship, rest or study is inconsiderate. That is a matter of manners and regard for others.

    ___

    Please watch the following video at the following time stamps:

    Response to 23 Questions — Part 62 (Ghina aur Moseeqi)

    32:53 — reads out all three bell narrations with references (Musnad Ahmad 8783, 7566; Nasai, al-Sunan al-Kubra 9483)

    34:03 — “this is not the issue of music or musical instruments; some other issue is under discussion”

    34:26 — the Prophet’s dhikr, recitation and Salah while travelling; angels frequenting his house and caravans

    39:15 — angels perpetual tasbih; a neck-bell cannot be switched off — the village oxen at the Persian wheel

    40:22 — “to make any judgment about general caravans is not acceptable in any way”

    40:49 — Umm Salama’s report; bells hung at village room doors, ringing as people brush past

    42:26 — the Badr narration (Musnad Ahmad 25166/25186); the wartime concealment explanation

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yj5qUMkAHq8&t=1973s

You must be logged in to reply.
Login | Register