-
Financial Responsibility Of Children
Why is the man the sole financer of children. I mean, if the woman can separate anytime she wants, its unfair on the man to still bear all the financial responsibility.
She doesn’t have to take care of the children. Its optional for her. Neither can she be held accountable for not obeying the husband.
If so, why is still all tye responsibility on the man?
-
2 Replies
-
Financial Responsibility Of Children
updated 5 hours, 25 minutes ago
2 Members
·
2
Replies
-
Since a man is responsible for providing for his family, he should think carefully before taking on this responsibility. He should have only as many children as he can reasonably afford to support. If he is unwilling or unable to fulfill this responsibility, he should reconsider getting married.
A woman has an important responsibility to care for and nurture her children. If she fails to fulfill this responsibility without a valid reason, she is accountable for her actions.
A woman is also expected to obey her husband within the bounds of reason and righteousness. If she disobeys him without a valid reason, she is considered to have failed in her responsibility, thus guilty.
-
Who holds the woman accountable, if she disobeys or doesn’t take care of the children:
The husband, can he force her?
Her family, can they force her?
The court of law
There is no law against disobedience of husband
See, if the man doesn’t fulfill his responsibility, he can be jailed, through courst.
If the woman doesn’t in return obey her husband, the whole system is powerless. Her responsibilities are all optional.
If not please enlighten me how can she be made to obey her husband or take care of her children?
Sponsor Ask Ghamidi
