Ask Ghamidi

A Community Driven Discussion Portal
To Ask, Answer, Share And Learn

Forums Forums Epistemology and Philosophy Huruf-e-Muqattaat: Farahi Theory

  • Huruf-e-Muqattaat: Farahi Theory

    Posted by Umer on June 28, 2020 at 9:01 pm

    More than one-fourth of the Qur’ānic Sūrahs begin with certain abbreviated letters called Hurūf-i-Muqatta‘āt. These letters are actually the names of the respective sūrahs, as is evident from the Qur’ān. Many Ahādith as well as the pre-Islamic Arabic literature endorse this view. However, there remains the question of why the sūrahs are called so. Many scholars have attempted to answer the question but what they have come up with is not very satisfactory. Farahi (d:1930 AD) has presented an explanation which might hold the key to the problem. We shall briefly discuss his theory.

    Those who are aware of the history of the Arabic alphabet know that it has been derived from the Hebrew alphabet, which itself has its roots in the alphabet used in ancient Arabia. Farahi is of the view that the letters of this parent alphabet as English and Hindi do not represent phonetic sounds only, but as the Chinese alphabet symbolise certain meanings and objects and usually assume the shape of the objects and meanings they convey. He goes on to assert that it was these letters which the early Egyptians adopted and after adapting them according to their own concepts founded the hieroglyphic script from them. The remnants of this script can be seen in the tables of the Egyptian Pyramids.

    The science which deciphers the meanings of these letters is now extinct. However, there are some letters whose meanings have persisted to this day, and the way they are written also somewhat resembles their ancient forms. For example, it is known about the Arabic letter Alif that it is used to mean a cow and was represented by a cow’s head. The letter Bā in Hebrew is called Beth and means Bayt (house) as well. The Hebrew pronunciation of Jīm is Gimel which means Jamal (camel). Tā stands for a serpent and is written in a serpent’s shape also. Mīm represents a water wave and also has a similar configuration.

    Farahi presents Sūrah Nūn in support of his theory. The letter Nūn still denotes its ancient meaning of fish. In this Sūrah, the Prophet Jonah (sws) has been addressed as Sahibu’l-Hūt that is he who is swallowed by a whale. Farahi opines that it is because of this reference that the Sūrah is called Nūn. He goes on to say that if one keeps in consideration the example given above, it is quite likely that the abbreviated letters by which other Sūrahs commence are placed at the beginning of the Sūrahs to symbolise a relation between the topics of a particular Sūrah and their own ancient connotations.

    Some other names of the Qur’ānic Sūrahs reinforce Farahi’s theory. Sūrah Tāhā, for example, begins with the letter Tā which represents a serpent, as has been indicated before. After a brief introduction the tale of Moses (sws) and his staff which is transformed into a snake has been depicted in it. Other Sūrahs as Tāsīn and Tāsīn Mīm, which begin with the letter Tā, also portray this miraculous episode.

    Sūrah Baqarah, which begins with the letter Alif, is another example which further strengthens Farahi’s claims. It has been indicated before that the letter Alif had the meaning of a cow associated with it and is represented by a cow’s head. Sūrah Baqarah, as we all know, contains the anecdote of a cow and its sacrifice.

    Another aspect of the Sūrahs which begin with the same letter is a similarity in their topics and even in their style and construction. For example, all Sūrahs which begin with Alif basically deal with Tawhīd (monotheism). It would be appropriate here to point out that the letter Alif also stood for Allah, the One and Alone.

    We have presented here Farahi’s theory only because it is substantiated to some extent with sound arguments. It must be conceded that the theory needs to be developed and verified still further if it is to be accepted as the only logical explanation of why the Qur’ānic Sūrahs are so named.

    (Dr. Shehzad Saleem)

    (Adapted from Islāhī’s ‘Tadabbur-i-Qur’ān’)

    Ahsan replied 2 years, 8 months ago 7 Members · 26 Replies
  • 26 Replies
  • Huruf-e-Muqattaat: Farahi Theory

    Ahsan updated 2 years, 8 months ago 7 Members · 26 Replies
  • Umer

    Moderator June 28, 2020 at 9:46 pm

    Ghamidi Sb. explaining Huruf-i-Muqattaat in the following video from 16:36 to 27:05

    https://youtu.be/iKKs2rimMs4?t=996

  • $ohail T@hir

    Moderator June 29, 2020 at 2:32 pm
    • Ahmad Shoaib

      Contributor October 25, 2020 at 9:09 am

      Why don’t we fend mich evidence of the sahabah believing this?

  • Saira Qureshi

    Member October 25, 2020 at 9:38 am

    My confusion is … ..why not all the surahs are named then … why only one fourth??

  • Saira Qureshi

    Member October 25, 2020 at 9:41 am

    Also “ Didn’t any one in 23 years of prophet’s lifetime’ ask the meaning of these words ?

  • Umer

    Moderator October 25, 2020 at 9:13 pm

    Please also see this discussion from 14:56 to 25:51

    https://youtu.be/VgQ4m6Pcfbg?t=896

    • Ahmad Shoaib

      Contributor October 26, 2020 at 8:52 am

      Did the Arabs use the letters with their old Pictionary form? If not why did God put them in the Quran? If they did why don’t we find evidence that they used them in this way?

    • Faizan Ahmed

      Member October 26, 2020 at 11:06 am

      Watch this 23:30 onwards.

      https://youtu.be/iKKs2rimMs4

    • Ahmad Shoaib

      Contributor October 26, 2020 at 6:15 pm

      I mean the Arabs of the time of sahabah. If these letters were known this way how did they lose their meaning so far to scholars saying only God knows their meaning till now?

    • Umer

      Moderator October 26, 2020 at 8:17 pm

      Somewhat similar question was asked at the end of this video as well:

      Discussion 1760 • Reply 34321

      But please note that this is not a conclusive interpretation of these Haruf, but is definitely a more logical one supported by linguistic history.

    • Ahmad Shoaib

      Contributor October 27, 2020 at 8:20 am

      Yes but at what time in history we’re the Arabs in relation to interpretation of these letters. They had to have known what they meant right?

  • Umer

    Moderator October 27, 2020 at 9:10 pm

    Response by Hassan Ilyas Sahab:

    • Ahmad Shoaib

      Contributor October 27, 2020 at 9:45 pm

      So we have lost some of the meaning of the Quran that was known to the sahaba?

    • Umer

      Moderator October 27, 2020 at 9:48 pm

      If we had lost it then Imam Farahi couldn’t have discovered it. This usage became Archaic you can say.

    • Ahmad Shoaib

      Contributor October 27, 2020 at 9:50 pm

      And I have seen an article on al mawrid that shows the meaning of all of them with cords reference etc. So we do also know the meaning as well now. So there is no problem right?

    • Umer

      Moderator October 28, 2020 at 5:30 pm

      Still we haven’t established the meaning of all such combinations used in Quran itself.

    • Ahmad Shoaib

      Contributor October 28, 2020 at 5:31 pm
    • Umer

      Moderator October 28, 2020 at 5:39 pm

      These are individual letters but there are certain combinations used in Quran which are still a matter of continued research.

    • Ahmad Shoaib

      Contributor October 29, 2020 at 3:15 pm

      So their usage is archaic and not known. But I was also told that the language of the Quran has been preserved in Arab literature etc. So how can the two both be true?

    • Umer

      Moderator October 29, 2020 at 3:34 pm

      It is not their meanings that are not known, it is those particular combinations of these Huruf when seen in relation to some Surahs with which they are used — that relationship needs to be established and for that more research needs to be done. Some relationships have been established but not all.

    • Ahmad Shoaib

      Contributor October 29, 2020 at 3:36 pm

      Maybe my base premises are just incorrect. Is there actually anything wrong with the Quran still having some mysteries to be unfolded? (I understand it’s the relations and not the actual letters now)

    • Umer

      Moderator October 29, 2020 at 3:44 pm

      Not with regards to the meaning but I think there are some verses whose manifestations will keep getting more clear with time.

    • Ahmad Shoaib

      Contributor October 29, 2020 at 3:44 pm

      👍

    • Hamza Faheem

      Member November 13, 2020 at 6:20 am

      You are absolutely right. Quran is a revelation that meets the needs of the day and explains contemporary subjects. In that sense, it is a dynamic book that keeps updating mankind as it moves ahead in time. Just one example Quran explains the foetus formation in the womb in stages. We all know that in current times these things can be observed even by common people who wish to see the pregnancy stages. While in ancient times it was just believed as a verse in the Quran. So the understanding of the verse has evolved enormously in the last 1400 years. Belief in that particular verse has turned to yaqeen . While in olden days it was a kind of Ilm e ghayb , in our times it is ilm e shahadat which we can witness. Similarly there are many matters that the Quran will expound as time advances and people are ready for it.

    • Hamza Faheem

      Member November 13, 2020 at 7:07 am

      I went through the Farahi theory and noticed something. He used the example of Prophet Yunus a.s. wherein he is mentioned as Dhun Nun or the man of whale/fish Surah Al qalam starts with Nun the abrreviated letter. According to Farahi sab the arabic letter nun denotes fish in cuneiform. Totally agreed. Just note this too. Yunus a.s. lived on the banks of euphrates in Iraq where the language used was mesopotamian and fish is denoted as nun in that culture. Quran says that the prophets were sent to people with books in their own language. So Quran no wonder addresses the prophet Yunus a.s. in his own name and language. Amazing theory needs further study

  • Ahsan

    Moderator August 16, 2021 at 12:12 am

    Thoery of Huruf e Muqattaat as published in Ishraq

The discussion "Huruf-e-Muqattaat: Farahi Theory" is closed to new replies.

Start of Discussion
0 of 0 replies June 2018
Now