Ask Ghamidi

A Community Driven Discussion Portal
To Ask, Answer, Share And Learn

Forums Forums Islam and Family Rights Of The Head Of The Family

  • Rights Of The Head Of The Family

    Umer updated 3 years, 8 months ago 6 Members · 36 Replies
  • Beenish Hussain

    Member August 7, 2020 at 6:59 pm
  • Beenish Hussain

    Member August 7, 2020 at 6:59 pm
  • Sameer Bhagwat

    Contributor August 7, 2020 at 11:47 pm

    https://islamqa.info/en/answers/43123/obeying-ones-husband-comes-before-obeying-ones-parents-and-siblings

    Ibn Maajah (1853) narrated that ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Abi Awfa said: When Mu’aadh came from Syria, he prostrated to the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) who said, “What is this, O Mu’aadh?” He said, I went to Syria and saw them prostrating to their archbishops and patriarchs, and I wanted to do that for you. The Messenger of Allaah (S) said, “Do not do that. If I were to command anyone to prostrate to anyone other than Allaah, I would have commanded women to prostrate to their husbands. By the One in Whose hand is the soul of Muhammad, no woman can fulfil her duty towards Allaah until she fulfils her duty towards her husband. If he asks her (for intimacy) even if she is on her camel saddle, she should not refuse.”

    Classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh Ibn Maajah.

  • Sameer Bhagwat

    Contributor August 8, 2020 at 12:59 am

    This hadith clearly outlines that the limits of obedience are not confined to “which school the children should go to” .

    The wife must obey her husband’s demands for intimacy .

    https://sunnah.com/muslim/16/143

    Abu Huraira (Allah be pleased with him) reported Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) as saying:

    By Him in Whose Hand is my life, when a man calls his wife to his bed, and she does not respond, the One Who is in the heaven is displeased with her until he (her) is pleased with her husband.

  • Sameer Bhagwat

    Contributor August 8, 2020 at 4:58 am

    This thread can give further inputs as to how wife should respect the rights of her husband, and obey him .. and husband should also be gentle to his wife.

    Discussion 1468

    However, in certain circumstances in which the husband genuinely considers that going out might disrupt the family in any way, he has the authority to exercise his right of stopping her and in these circumstances, she should always ask permission to leave the house.

    • Sameer Bhagwat

      Contributor August 8, 2020 at 4:06 pm

      Beenish ji,

      I think the husband should have to take his wife’s permission before watching cricket also ..

  • Yusha ibn ghaffar yusha

    Member August 8, 2020 at 5:38 pm

    Islamic Law

    I

    الرِّجَالُ قَوَّامُونَ عَلَى النِّسَاءِ بِمَا فَضَّلَ اللَّهُ بَعْضَهُمْ عَلَى بَعْضٍ وَبِمَا أَنفَقُوا مِنْ أَمْوَالِهِم فَالصَّالِحَاتُ قَانِتَاتٌ حَافِظَاتٌ لِلْغَيْبِ بِمَا حَفِظَ اللَّهُ وَاللَّاتِي تَخَافُونَ نُشُوزَهُنَّ فَعِظُوهُنَّ وَاهْجُرُوهُنَّ فِي الْمَضَاجِعِ وَاضْرِبُوهُنَّ فَإِنْ أَطَعْنَكُمْ فَلَا تَبْغُوا عَلَيْهِنَّ سَبِيلًا إِنَّ اللَّهَ كَانَ عَلِيًّا كَبِيرًا(34:4)

    Men are the guardians of women, because God has given the one more preference than the other, and because they support them. Consequently, pious women are obedient [to their husbands] and keep their secrets for Allah also keeps secrets. And as for those from whom you fear rebellion, admonish them [first] and [next] refuse to share their beds and [even then if they do not listen] punish them. Then if they obey you, take no further action against them. Indeed Allah is Exalted and Mighty. (4:34)

    In the preceding verses, the Almighty has made it clear that the real sphere in which one should strive in outdoing others is not the sphere of inborn abilities and characteristics because in this sphere some have been ordained to hold preference over others. The Almighty has created some superior to the others as regards their mental, physical, economic and social status. Similar is the case between a man and a woman. They have been created as counterparts such that one is by nature the active member and the other the passive. While the former trait needs domination, vigor and force the latter needs gentleness, subtlety and acquiescence. Viewed thus, each possesses relative superiority to the other. These are inborn characteristics and any effort to surpass one another in this area would be tantamount to war against nature. This would of course only leave them to mourn their own misfortune.

    The Almighty has pointed out that in contrast to this sphere, there is another sphere in which people should strive to outdo one another. This is the sphere of earning reward for oneself through good deeds, high character and virtue. The Qur’an at various places has referred to this sphere by the comprehensive words ‘faith’ and ‘righteous deeds’ There is no restriction on anyone in striving to outdo others in this sphere; in fact, trying to surpass others in this sphere is as desired as it is condemnable in the sphere of innate abilities. Both a man and a woman will earn great reward if they strive and exert themselves in this area. It is open for every person whether a bondsman or a free man, a person of high social status or low, good-looking or ugly, blind or blessed with the faculty of sight. If a person does want to become superior to others, it is this sphere that he should select for all his efforts and endeavors. Wasting one’s effort in the wrong sphere only brings into existence clashes and disputes which are of no avail. Consequently, if he really wants to test his mettle and expend his energies, he must select the sphere of piety and virtue. The Qur’an says:

    وَلَا تَتَمَنَّوْا مَا فَضَّلَ اللَّهُ بِهِ بَعْضَكُمْ عَلَى بَعْضٍ لِلرِّجَالِ نَصِيبٌ مِمَّا اكْتَسَبُوا وَلِلنِّسَاءِ نَصِيبٌ مِمَّا اكْتَسَبْنَ وَاسْأَلُوا اللَّهَ مِنْ فَضْلِهِ إِنَّ اللَّهَ كَانَ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ عَلِيمًا 0(4: 32)

    And in no way covet those things in which God has bestowed His favors on some of you than on others: to men is allotted what they earn, and to women what they earn. And ask God of His bounty. For God has full knowledge of all things. (4:32)

    This verse pinpoints the above stated premise as the guiding principle in the organization of a family set-up. A family is like a small state. Just as every state requires a ruler for its establishment and survival, this small state also requires someone to take charge of its helm. Either the husband could have been bestowed with this responsibility or the wife. The Qur’an informs us that the husband has been entrusted with this responsibility. The expression ‘قَوَّامُونَ عَلَى النِّسَاءِ’ has been used by the Qur’an to convey this purport. In Arabic, when the preposition ‘عَلَى’ is used after the verb ‘قَامَ’, the meanings of ‘protection’ and ‘financial dependency’ are incorporated in the verb. A person who is in charge is actually the protector and bread runner of the members that are entrusted in his responsibility. The Qur’an has given two reasons for this choice. While explaining these reasons, ImamAmin Ahsan Islahiwrites:

    First, men have been granted superiority over women. There are certain innate abilities and traits in men which are more pronounced in him and because of which he has been made the head of a family unit. For example, a man is much more gifted innately to protect and to defend himself and to earn livelihood and to take the initiative than a woman. It should be appreciated here that the superiority men have over women is not absolute: it is only in certain spheres – spheres which entitle men to become head of the family unit. There are certain other spheres in which women are more superior than men but they do not entitle them to become the head of family. For example, the extent of ability a woman has to take care of household affairs and the ability to look after children, a man does not have. That is why the superiority which is mentioned in the verse is alluded to in an implicit manner such that it can be concluded that both men and women are superior to one another in different spheres1; however, a man is superior to the woman as far as becoming the head of family is concerned.

    Second, a husband bears financial responsibility for the wife. It is his obligation to earn and fulfill the needs of his wife and children. Obviously, this responsibility has not been assumed as a coincidence or as a favor, but because of the fact that only he is fully capable of doing so. It is therefore befitting that he take this responsibility.2

    After declaring that the husband should head a family, the Qur’an goes on to point out certain things to the wife for the smooth functioning of the institution of family. They are:

    1. Wives should be obedient and adaptable to their husbands.

    2. They should keep the secrets of their husbands and protect their honor and integrity.

    The first of these things does not require elaboration. Without obedience and adjustment, no system can work whether it be a state or any other institution. This is the natural requirement of any system. In the absence of these attitudes, no system can function and will ultimately disintegrate by giving way to indiscipline and anarchy.

    The expression ‘حَافِظَات لِلْغَيْبِ’ has been adopted for the second of these things. Generally, this expression has been taken to imply ‘guarding in absentia’. This writer has taken it to imply ‘keeping of secrets’, as this in his opinion is the correct connotation of the expression. While explaining the meaning of this expression ImamAmin Ahsan Islahiwrites:

    One reason for adopting this meaning is that the word ‘غَيْب’ is very commonly used to imply ‘secrets’. Second, here the nature of the expression is such that it cannot be taken to mean ‘guarding in absentia’. Third, guarding of secrets is one of the most important issues between a husband and wife. They are the natural protectors of one another in this regard. The position of the wife is more important in this regard. She has full knowledge of her husband’s weaknesses and strengths. She has acute knowledge of what ensues in the house as well has full knowledge of the extent and nature of her husband’s wealth and property. His honor and integrity rest with her. If she decides to reveal all his secrets, she can totally disgrace him. For this reason, the Qur’an has specially mentioned this attribute of a wife. The addition of the words ‘حَفِظَ اللَّهُ’ is very meaningful and refers to the exalted status of this attribute: it is in fact a manifestation of a divine attribute in man. The Almighty also keeps secrets of His creatures. If He starts revealing their secrets every one would be totally humiliated.3

    Thus the above verse outlines the attitude of pious wives. As a natural outcome of this directive, wives who adopt a rebellious attitude or reveal household secrets are not pious in the eyes of the Almighty.

    The question arises whether a husband can punish a wife who becomes rebellious and persists to be so. The Qur’an has replied to this question in the affirmative. The verse refers to the rebellion of a wife by the word ‘نُشُوْز’. Literally it means ‘to defy authority’; however it is predominantly used for the utter defiance of authority a wife shows for the husband. Obviously, the word is not used for a blemish or for some instance of indifference by the wife. Similarly, it does not imply that a wife cannot express her opinion, taste or the various traits of her personality. It implies the behavior which a wife adopts when she seems inclined to challenge the authority of the husband and disrupt the discipline of the house. If the situation reaches this extent, the Almighty has given a husband three options:

    First, he should urge his wife to mend her ways. The word used by the Qur’an is ‘وَعَظ’ which means that she can be admonished and also scolded to some extent in this regard.

    Secondly, intimate marital relations with her should be suspended in order to communicate that if she does not mend her ways she might have to face severe repercussions.

    Third, she should be punished physically. This punishment should obviously be similar to the one a teacher gives to a student or that a father gives to his children. The Prophet (sws) has used the words ‘غَيْرَ مُبَرِّح’ (mild) for such punishment (see Abu Da’ud, No: 1878).

    It is evident from the style of the verse that a gradual sequence should be adopted in exercising these options. In other words, the second step after the first and the third after the second should only be adopted if the husband is convinced that there is no other option but to go on to the next step. These measures point to the utmost limit to which a husband can go regarding admonishing his wife. The Qur’an says that if the wife mends her ways through these measures a husband should not look for revenge and vengeance. He is warned thus: ‘إِنَّ اللَّهَ كَانَ عَلِيًّا كَبِيرًا’ (Indeed God is Exalted and Mighty). The implication being that if the Lord of the heavens and the earth forgoes the arrogance of His creatures and forgives them if they repent, His creatures should also not misuse their authority over others.

    II

    يَاأَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا لَا يَحِلُّ لَكُمْ أَنْ تَرِثُوا النِّسَاءَ كَرْهًا وَلَا تَعْضُلُوهُنَّ لِتَذْهَبُوا بِبَعْضِ مَا آتَيْتُمُوهُنَّ إِلَّا أَنْ يَأْتِينَ بِفَاحِشَةٍ مُبَيِّنَةٍ وَعَاشِرُوهُنَّ بِالْمَعْرُوفِ فَإِنْ كَرِهْتُمُوهُنَّ فَعَسَى أَنْ تَكْرَهُوا شَيْئًا وَيَجْعَلَ اللَّهُ فِيهِ خَيْرًا كَثِيرًا(19:4)

    O you who believe! You are forbidden to inherit women against their will. Nor should you treat them with harshness that you may take away part of the dower you have given them – except where they have been guilty of open lewdness; on the contrary, live with them according to the norms [of the society]. If you take a dislike to them it may be that you dislike a thing, and Allah brings about through it a great deal of good. (4:19)

    These verses mention the rights of women and instruct the society regarding the correct behavior to be adopted with them.

    The first thing pointed out is that women are not animals which a person may inherit and then use them the way he likes. They too are human beings who have an independent personality. They are given free will which they can exercise in the limits set forth by the Almighty. The background of giving this directive is that in certain sections of pre-Islamic Arabia, the wives of a person were also transferred to his heirs like his wealth and animals would be, and if he had sons, they would even establish sexual relations with these step mothers without any hesitation. The Qur’an sought to put an end to this ignominious custom and stressed that women are fully free to make their decisions. Nothing can be imposed upon them without their consent.

    The second thing stressed here is that even if a believer dislikes his wife he should not subject her to harsh treatment in order to recover any wealth or property that he has gifted her. Such an attitude can only be accepted if the wife is guilty of open sexual transgressions. If the wife is not guilty of such behavior and is living as a faithful and obedient lady leading a virtuous life, it is totally against justice and decency for the husband to harass her merely because he dislikes her. No doubt if a wife shows moral misconduct then this is a detestable thing, but no husband is allowed to deprive her of a decent living because he does not like her face or because her temperament is different from his.

    The third thing emphasized here is that a husband who does not like his wife should still deal with her in accordance with the norms of justice and equity, graciousness and decency – to which his own nature testifies. The words used in the verse to convey this meaning are ‘وَعَاشِرُوهُنَّ بِالْمَعْرُوفِ’. The word ‘َمَعْرُوف’ implies good conventions and traditions of a society. In other words, the Qur’an instructs a husband to adopt a befitting attitude with his wife in accordance with the good traditions of the society whether he likes her or not. He is told that if he treats her nicely in spite of his aversion for her, he might win the blessings of the Almighty both in this world and in the Hereafter.

    While explaining the words used to convey the above mentioned meaning, ImamAmin Ahsan Islahiwrites:

    Although the word used here is ‘عَسَى’ which in Arabic implies hope and expectation, those who are aware of the delicacies of the language know that when used on occasions such as this, it implies a promise from the Almighty. The fact to which this reference points is that those who give priority to higher human traits and values instead of appearance are promised great rewards from the Almighty for this sacrifice. Those who have actually embarked upon this track have borne witness to the veracity of this fact, and none other than God is the most truthful.4

    It is obvious from the above discussion that if a husband is required to behave decently even if he dislikes the wife, he is all the more required to be decent when there is no cause for this dislike. A wrong attitude in this regard would earn great displeasure of the Almighty.

    In the sermon of the last Hajj, the Prophet (sws) is reported to have said:

    استوصوا بالنساء خيرا فإنهن عندكم عوان ليس تملكون منهن شيئا غير ذلك إلا أن يأتين بفاحشة مبينة فإن فعلن فاهجروهن في المضاجع واضربوهن ضربا غير مبرح فإن أطعنكم فلا تبغوا عليهن سبيلا إن لكم من نسائكم حقا ولنسائكم عليكم حقا فأما حقكم على نسائكم فلا يوطئن فرشكم من تكرهون ولا يأذن في بيوتكم لمن تكرهون ألا وحقهن عليكم أن تحسنوا إليهن في كسوتهن وطعامهن(ابن ماجه رقم: 1851)

    O people! Accept the advice regarding good treatment of women and [accept it] because they are duty bound [to fulfill your marital rights]. You have no other authority on them except this. And if they commit open sexual misconduct you have the right to leave them alone in their beds and [if even then, they do not listen] beat them such that this should not leave any mark on them. Then if they obey you, take no further action against them. Indeed you have rights over women and they also have rights over you. You have the right that they do not permit into your homes nor sleep with anyone you dislike. Listen! their right upon you is that you feed and clothe them in the best way [you are able to]. (Ibn Majah, No: 1841)
    (Translated from ‘Mizan’ by Shehzad Saleem)

  • Rafia Khawaja

    Member August 15, 2020 at 9:20 am

    Husband and wife are a pair. The husband is responsible for taking care of the family and maintaining them The rest is understanding their needs, have open discussions and being reasonable. Being head of the family does not mean he can enforce things on her against her will. There will be give and take.

    • Sameer Bhagwat

      Contributor August 15, 2020 at 5:50 pm

      “Being head of the family does not mean he can enforce things on her against her will.”

      Well, which verse says that ? OR is it the modern feminist view ?

  • Rafia Khawaja

    Member August 15, 2020 at 6:03 pm

    Show me a verse which says he can?

    • Sameer Bhagwat

      Contributor August 15, 2020 at 6:05 pm

      4:34 allows husband to enforce things against his wife’s will, as long as it doesn’t go against the religion. Wife is supposed to obey him.

  • Rafia Khawaja

    Member August 15, 2020 at 6:17 pm

    Please do not take this out of context. You are talking of extreme circumstances

    • Sameer Bhagwat

      Contributor August 15, 2020 at 6:19 pm

      Not extreme circumstances, it is the usual day-to-day life.. wife is supposed to obey her husband (as long as the order is not against the religion).. and obedience entails accepting orders which go against one’s will.

  • Rafia Khawaja

    Member August 15, 2020 at 6:24 pm

    4:34 does not say this. It talks of a wife who is on a rebellious path continuously, and is not prepared to have any discussions on any matter

    • Sameer Bhagwat

      Contributor August 15, 2020 at 6:26 pm

      That’s the directive only about punishments.. I am talking about the first part of the verse where wife is supposed to obey the husband.

  • Rafia Khawaja

    Member August 15, 2020 at 6:38 pm

    It does not say blank obeying. If the husband asks his wife, to cheat, steal, lie, is she suppose to obey him?

    Never!

    • Sameer Bhagwat

      Contributor August 15, 2020 at 6:41 pm

      Cheating and stealing is against the religion, so the wife is not supposed to obey him and she should prefer to obey Allah.

      For rest of the matters, she should obey her husband.

  • Rafia Khawaja

    Member August 15, 2020 at 7:21 pm

    I do not agree with you. There is no such thing as blind obedience

    • Sameer Bhagwat

      Contributor August 15, 2020 at 11:38 pm

      Rafia ji, when did I talk about blind obedience ? I clearly mentioned that the orders of her husband which go against the religion, are not to be obeyed.

      For rest of the matters, she must obey him.

  • Rafia Khawaja

    Member August 16, 2020 at 8:55 am

    I do not agree, there is mutual consultations, give and take, in matters of every day life. Neither husband or wife can insists he or she is right every time.

    • Sameer Bhagwat

      Contributor August 17, 2020 at 8:39 am

      Mutual consultations, give and take ?? Which verse says that for a proper wife, the best way to deal with your husband is mutual consultations, give and take, rather than obedience to the husband ?

      Nobody said husband is right every time..

  • Umer

    Moderator August 16, 2020 at 3:31 pm

    For recent ‘Q&A session with Ghamidi Sahab from questions selected from AskGhamidi platform’ , in the context of Verse (4:34), please refer to the recent reply posted by me in the following thread:

    Discussion 1265

    • Sameer Bhagwat

      Contributor August 18, 2020 at 9:27 am

      I watched it, but due to my Urdu not being good (I am learning it but still don’t understand many words and phrases in Urdu) I couldn’t get Ghamidi saab’s views properly.

      Now, if I understand him correctly, is he saying that once you accept Allah’s directive on dealing with disobedient wives, these 3 steps must be followed? I want to understand where is the choice in the verse 4:34 for a husband to adopt any other way apart from these 3 steps, while dealing with disobedient wives ? Allah has clearly outlined the 3 steps, and in the same order, so I don’t really get where is the choice for a Muslim husband to not beat his disobedient wife if the 2 steps don’t work ?

  • Rafia Khawaja

    Member August 18, 2020 at 9:45 am

    What I have understood divorce can be in the first step too . The 3 Steps are for the rebellious wife who doesn’t want to be divorced.

    If I understood wrong @UmerQureshi or @faisalharoon please correct me JazakAllah

    • Sameer Bhagwat

      Contributor August 18, 2020 at 9:49 am

      Divorce is independent of disobedience. Even an obedient wife can be divorced by her husband, by following the proper talaaq procedure (different scholars differ whether 3-talaaqs in one sitting is permitted but that is a separate topic). Interesting that, a wife has to ASK for divorce, while a husband has the right to divorce, the relation is not equal at all.

      Yes, in my opinion, a rebellious wife has to be beaten if the two steps don’t work.. this is my reading of 4:34 .. may be experts who know Qur’an better than me, can answer it, if my understanding is wrong.

    • Ahmad Shoaib

      Contributor August 18, 2020 at 8:23 pm

      Discussion 1265

      Please refer to the latest post by Umer bhai.

  • Rafia Khawaja

    Member August 18, 2020 at 10:01 am

    Yes let us ask @UmerQureshi or @faisalharoon

    Please.

  • Umer

    Moderator August 18, 2020 at 8:38 pm

    The directive is very clear right from the beginning that it is not an order but a suggestion/advice from the Almighty to save the family. The directive starts from “if you fear” which clearly means that it is a subjective matter which will be decided by husband seeing the circumstances and conditions around him. If he sees that its too late to save the family now, he can simply go for the divorce. And if he feels that there is still a chance to save the family, he can go for these steps but has to then follow the steps in sequence and even after first or second step, he becomes certain that the family cannot be saved, he can still go for the divorce. The step three is not to give some manly satisfaction to the Husband, it is only to save the family seeing the sensitivity of Islam to the institution of family. This advice/suggestion has given right to husband and whenever there is a right involved, party given the right can always forgo that right at any time. Furthermore, if the right is misused in the society, the govt. can always intervene and take the right away from husband and give it to itself. This will not change the objective of the verse, which is reformation of a rebellious wife, if there’s any chance for that.

    As far as right of divorce is concerned, wife can ask it from husband because husband needs to be given some time to think it through so that he can make certain arrangements for the divorce. There are certain responsibilities on husband as soon as divorce happens, e.g providing wife with essentials of life, providing for the kids, letting go of any property already gifted to the wife etc etc. Therefore, to keep these responsibilities in mind, a wife asks for divorce so that husband can take care of his responsibilities timely. And in case a husband tries to misuse that right, state can always intervene and make that divorce happen after a certain period of time.

  • Sameer Bhagwat

    Contributor August 18, 2020 at 9:39 pm

    If the verse 4:34 is not an order but just a suggestion from God, then husband isn’t bound to follow any of the steps. So, if a husband “fears disobedience from his wife”, can he not take any of the 3 steps and still live life properly and Allah will not ask him, when he feared disobedience, why he didn’t follow Allah’s order/suggestion ?

    The right of divorce is in the hand of husband, because of financial arrangements ? If the wife is financially independent, it doesn’t make any sense for the right to rest with husband.

  • Rafia Khawaja

    Member August 18, 2020 at 10:58 pm

    These are options given by God but it does not mean that you must do them. Maybe the husband finds the first step is not working and decides not to take the other steps. This is not an order from God but just options to follow if you think they will help.After the first step the wife can ask for a divorce.

    • Sameer Bhagwat

      Contributor August 19, 2020 at 12:10 am

      I don’t understand where does the verse say that these 3 steps are the options only and not to be followed if you think the 1st step is not working.. can he directly jump to 3rd step ?

    • Ahmad Shoaib

      Contributor August 19, 2020 at 12:43 am

      Please watch the video mentioned in the discussion that I sent a link to

    • Sameer Bhagwat

      Contributor August 19, 2020 at 12:50 am

      Which video ? I watched one given by Umer sahab.

    • Ahmad Shoaib

      Contributor August 19, 2020 at 12:51 am

      The one with Ghamidi sahab q&a. It addresses your points

    • Sameer Bhagwat

      Contributor August 19, 2020 at 1:29 am

      I watched it and had asked further questions.. please refer to my comment above..

  • Umer

    Moderator August 19, 2020 at 4:40 pm

    Firstly, we never used word disobedience in this context, we always used the word rebellion, even in the explanation of the verse in the following thread (third post):

    Discussion 1265

    And yes! it does have different connotations than the word disobedience. You’re requested to please read our point of view completely before criticizing our discourse (for your critique to be effective from an academic standpoint).

    It is not an order, the words are very clearly demonstrating that its a suggestion (as I have explained above) in case a husband sees any chance to still save the family.

    Secondly, whenever a principle is laid down, it is laid down keeping the essence or basis of a particular ideology, which in this case is that husband is the head of family with responsibility and accountability for providing for the family. Keeping this point in mind, general principle of divorce is laid down. Also, in addition to the matter of financial arrangements, there are issues related to iddat as well, and keeping in mind the broader picture, it still is better to give the right of divorce to husband.

    However, if a lady feels that she can mange everything on her own and can effectively coordinate the iddat requirements as well (if it ever comes down to that), the couple can agree at the time of Nikkah for the husband to let go of his right to divorce in favor of his wife. It is allowable but it still kills the rationale and logic behind the general principle.

The discussion "Rights Of The Head Of The Family" is closed to new replies.

Start of Discussion
0 of 0 replies June 2018
Now