Ask Ghamidi

A Community Driven Discussion Portal
To Ask, Answer, Share And Learn

Forums Forums Islam and State Enforcing Islamic Law By State The Way It Was Enforced By AbuBakr And Umar (rta)

  • Enforcing Islamic Law By State The Way It Was Enforced By AbuBakr And Umar (rta)

    Posted by Tamzid Al Hasan on August 24, 2021 at 5:35 pm

    We see that Khalifas like Abu Bakr, Umar etc. did implemented the Sharia at a state level. It is also permissible to force someone to perform Salah as mentioned in the hadith to go as far as beating. So Why can a Islamic government not enforce Sharia without the compliance of its people?

    Umer replied 2 years, 7 months ago 2 Members · 1 Reply
  • 1 Reply
  • Enforcing Islamic Law By State The Way It Was Enforced By AbuBakr And Umar (rta)

    Umer updated 2 years, 7 months ago 2 Members · 1 Reply
  • Umer

    Moderator August 25, 2021 at 3:16 am

    Which Sharia implementation are you referring to?

    Religion contains directives for individuals to implement in their lives. Some of these directives becasue of their nature, can only be implemented by society through their elected leaders. And these directives are very clear i.e. Zakat, Jihad and implemetation of islamic punishments. There are no other directives that can be implemented by the rulers. Abu Bakar (rta) and Umar (rta) both implemented the very directives, in addition to their special directive of itmam-e-hujjah as well. And implementation of Salah and Zakat in Quran Surah Tauba originally relates to itmam-e-hujjah. But states in later times can use certain administrative measures to ensure their implementation as well.Please see for details:

    Discussion 25671 • Reply 25768

    Regarding Hadith on beating kids for Salah, work related to these narrations in Hadith Project has lead to conclusion that such narrations do not hold any merit to be ascribed to Prophet Muhammad (Sws). Please see for details:

    Discussion 44021

    Even if someone ascribes these narrations to Prophet Muhammad (Sws), they mean something else when seen in the context of the institution of family. Please see:

    Discussion 36672

    Please also refer to the video below from 7:23 to 9:17

    https://youtu.be/YZbZexPa1wo?t=443

You must be logged in to reply.
Login | Register